Furman Hall 114
A lecture by Prof. Candace Vogler (Chicago University)
This event is co-sponsored by University Catholic and the Thomistic Institute
Free and open to the public.
"The thought that good is to be pursued, and bad is to be avoided is a basic condition on the intelligibility of animal movement generally. We are intellectual animals—the kinds of animals that need to figure out what to pursue and how to go about pursuing it. And this means that pursuit and avoidance are harder for us than they are for other kinds of animals. For all that, making sense of what we go for and what we fear or flee operates in the context of some understanding of what is good for human beings. These days, in the face of stark and shrill disagreement among thoughtful people about some of the most basic aspects of our lives, it can seem as though people have lost any clear, common understanding of human good. Moral disagreement can seem completely intractable. In this talk, I will look at some serious, likely intractable examples of profound moral disagreement, with an eye toward learning how to think about and engage these topics in the secure understanding that disagreement is partly a function of the challenges that intellectual animals face in trying to see what is good for them, urging a kind of modesty that does not require setting aside one’s own convictions."
Candace Vogler is the David B. and Clara E. Stern Professor of Philosophy and Professor in the College at the University of Chicago, and Principal Investigator on "Virtue, Happiness, and the Meaning of Life," a project funded by the John Templeton Foundation. She has authored two books, John Stuart Mill's Deliberative Landscape: An essay in moral psychology (Routledge, 2001) and Reasonably Vicious (Harvard University Press, 2002), and essays in ethics, social and political philosophy, philosophy and literature, cinema, psychoanalysis, gender studies, sexuality studies, and other areas. Her research interests are in practical philosophy (particularly the strand of work in moral philosophy indebted to Elizabeth Anscombe), practical reason, Kant's ethics, Marx, and neo-Aristotelian naturalism.